The US Department of Justice (DoJ) has launched a significant antitrust lawsuit against Visa, accusing the payments giant of leveraging its dominance in the debit payments market to stifle competition and maintain inflated fees.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court, alleges that Visa has created a “web of exclusionary agreements” with merchants and banks, effectively ensuring that debit card transactions are primarily routed through its network, which the DoJ claims results in higher fees and increased costs for consumers.
With more than 60% of US debit transactions processed through Visa’s network, the company has firmly established itself as a market leader.
However, the DoJ’s civil complaint argues that Visa’s dominance allows it to charge over $7 billion annually in processing fees — charges that ultimately impact consumer prices.
US Attorney General Merrick Garland emphasised in the lawsuit, the wide-reaching consequences, stating, “Visa’s unlawful conduct affects not just the price of one thing — but the price of nearly everything.”
Visa’s Response: Defending Its Position
Visa quickly labelled the lawsuit “meritless,” arguing that it operates in an increasingly competitive payments landscape.
In a statement, the company highlighted the diversity of available payment options and asserted that Visa is “just one of many competitors in a debit space that is growing.”
Indeed, the proliferation of fintech companies such as PayPal, Square, Apple Pay, to name but a few, along with regulatory changes, have introduced numerous alternative ways to pay.
However, the DoJ counters that Visa’s grip on the debit market gives it an outsized influence on transaction costs, impacting businesses and consumers alike.
The lawsuit references a series of exclusionary tactics Visa allegedly uses to maintain its dominance.
These tactics include entering contracts with merchants and banks that incentivise them to route a high volume of transactions through Visa’s network in exchange for bulk discounts.
This practice, according to the DoJ, effectively forces merchants to choose Visa, even when competitors offer lower per-transaction prices.
The “Moat” Around Visa’s Business
One of the most striking allegations in the lawsuit is that Visa has built an “enormous moat” around its business by forming close relationships with banks and retailers, preventing potential competitors from gaining a foothold in the debit payments market.
The DoJ suggests that Visa has co-opted rivals through strategic partnerships that either offered financial incentives or imposed punishing fees, creating an ecosystem where competition is minimised.
The complaint also draws attention to Visa’s response to the rise of fintech competitors.
Notably, Visa considered Apple Pay an “existential threat” due to its widespread adoption among consumers and merchants. Furthermore, after signing an early contract with Square, a Visa executive allegedly remarked that they had the fintech company “on a short leash,” underscoring Visa’s strategic approach to dealing with competitors.
Broader Implications and Legal Precedents
This is not the first time Visa has faced legal scrutiny. In 2020, the DoJ filed a lawsuit to block Visa’s $5.3 billion acquisition of fintech company Plaid, a deal that was eventually abandoned.
Visa’s main rival, Mastercard, has also faced regulatory pressure, settling with the Federal Trade Commission last year over allegations it illegally forced merchants to process debit payments via its network.
Despite these challenges, Visa’s influence over the debit market has remained largely intact. However, this latest lawsuit could reshape the competitive landscape if successful.
Progressive antitrust officials in the Biden administration have pushed for tougher enforcement, signalling a departure from what they view as decades of lax regulation.
With Visa shares dropping 5.5% following the lawsuit announcement, investors will be keenly watching how the case unfolds.
A Pivotal Moment for the Payments Industry?
The antitrust lawsuit against Visa may mark a pivotal moment in the US payments industry, but its broader implications will be felt much further afield.
As the largest player in the debit market, Visa’s practices have long been a source of concern for regulators and competitors alike.
Should the DoJ succeed in proving that Visa has unlawfully maintained its dominance, the resulting changes could significantly alter the landscape for debit payments, bringing new competition to the forefront and potentially reducing transaction fees for merchants and consumers.
As the case progresses, it will serve as a key test of the Biden administration’s more aggressive approach to antitrust enforcement in the payments sector.
The post US antitrust lawsuit targets Visa’s debit payments dominance appeared first on Payments Cards & Mobile.